Signals and scoring
Links come from fixed rules, so the same data always gives the same result. AI only writes the plain-English summary, and a point that can't cite a real link gets thrown out.
Signals
| Signal | What it means | Typical confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Same transaction | One transaction bought for several wallets | High |
| Creator funding | SOL came straight from the wallet that created the token | High |
| Direct funding | One early buyer sent SOL to another | High |
| Shared fee payer | An outside wallet paid the network fee on separate buys | High |
| Token transfer | One early wallet passed tokens to another | High |
| Shared funder | The same wallet sent SOL to several early buyers | Medium, or high with supporting evidence |
| Synced new wallets | Brand new wallets funded together by different senders | Low |
| Same slot | Bought in the same slot, which sniper bots also do independently | Low |
Confidence
Every link adds up points, and the panel lists each one, including what counted against it.
| High | 70 points or more |
|---|---|
| Medium | 40 to 69 points |
| Low | Under 40. Shown, but never forms a cluster |
Timing flags
A flag means wallets got their SOL within 5 minutes of each other. Each flag shows how far before launch that happened, because funding a week earlier means less than funding a minute earlier.
Noise filtering
Most apparent shared funders aren't meaningful, so Ghostprint treats them differently:
- Pools, routers and program accounts pay many unrelated traders. They're left out of links.
- Dust under 0.01 SOL isn't counted as funding.
- Exchanges and very high-volume senders stay visible, but are capped at low confidence.
Every results page lists what was filtered, so you can overrule it.
Ghost Score
The score combines five things, each capped so no single one can dominate:
- The share of early wallets that link together
- The share of supply those wallets took
- How many high confidence links there are
- Direct ties, such as creator funding or a same-transaction buy
- Timing flags
0 to 24 reads as few links, 25 to 49 as some, 50 to 74 as many, and 75 or more as heavily linked.
It is not a safety rating. It says how connected the first wallets look, not whether a token is safe to buy or whether anyone did anything wrong.